Genesis 46:26-34

All the persons belonging to Jacob who came into Egypt, who were his own offspring, not including the wives of his sons, were sixty-six persons in all. The children of Joseph, who were born to him in Egypt, were two; all the persons of the house of Jacob who came into Egypt were seventy.

Israel [Jacob] sent Judah ahead to Joseph to lead the way before him into Goshen. When they came to the land of Goshen, Joseph made ready his chariot and went up to meet his father Israel in Goshen. He presented himself to him, fell on his neck, and wept on his neck a good while. Israel said to Joseph, “I can die now, having seen for myself that you are still alive.” Joseph said to his brothers and to his father’s household, “I will go up and tell Pharaoh, and will say to him, ‘My brothers and my father’s household, who were in the land of Canaan, have come to me. The men are shepherds, for they have been keepers of livestock; and they have brought their flocks, and their herds, and all that they have.’ When Pharaoh calls you, and says, ‘What is your occupation?’ you shall say, ‘Your servants have been keepers of livestock from our youth even until now, both we and our ancestors’—in order that you may settle in the land of Goshen, because all shepherds are abhorrent to the Egyptians.”

Did you catch that last line?  “Shepherds are abhorrent to the Egyptians.”  Beneath that phrase are long-standing and long-accepted beliefs about class and ethnicity.  Egyptians are superior.  Even though Jacob’s family was welcomed by Pharaoh, the immigrants were viewed as inferior by the general public due to their occupation and they were physically segregated. An undercurrent of suspicion and mistrust of the ethnic outsider existed within the culture that the next Pharaoh was able to exploit to oppress and enslave Jacob’s descendants.

White supremacy is REAL!  For at least the past 500+ years, white Western Europeans have assumed their superiority over all other people.  The results have been the genocide of indigenous tribes, the enslavement of Africans, the subjugation of people groups through expansionist foreign policy, and ethnic cleansing.  Not surprisingly then, white supremacy has also shaped immigration and naturalization policy in the U.S. over the past 225+ years.  Here are some highlights that reflect the white supremacy narrative:

The 1790 Naturalization Act allowed only free white persons of moral character who had resided in the U.S. for 2 years to become citizens.

The Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882 was the first law that was specifically designed to ban immigration by a specific ethnic group.  Passage was motivated in part around concerns for maintaining white racial purity. It was not repealed until 1943.

The Immigration Act of 1917 was overwhelmingly approved despite the veto of President Woodrow Wilson.  Playing to nativist sentiments, the law expanded the immigration ban to include people within a specified longitudinal/latitudinal grid that included Afghanistan, the Arabian Peninsula, Central Asia, India, Malaysia, Myanmar, and the Polynesian Islands.

The Immigration Act of 1924 drastically cut the number of immigrants allowed into the country annually, curtailed immigration from southern and Eastern Europe and specifically prohibited anarchists, pacifists, members of “radical” labor unions, and homosexuals.

Maybe denying access to the United States is more “American” than we would like to believe.

Follow the entire history of immigration law HERE.

Questions for Reflection

What do you think motivates the creation of a narrative of superiority or inferiority?

Often feelings of superiority based on race or ethnicity are so engrained in us that we do not recognize it in our actions.  If you are white, how could you become more aware of your attitudes and actions based in supremacy or so you can change them?   If you are a person of color, how does the narrative of white supremacy shape your self-understanding and behavior?

Psalm 72:1-4

Give the king your justice, O God, and your righteousness to a king’s son.
May he judge your people with righteousness, and your poor with justice.
May the mountains yield prosperity for the people, and the hills, in righteousness.
May he defend the cause of the poor of the people, give deliverance to the needy, and crush the oppressor. 

Psalm 72 is a coronation Psalm, likely read/sung/prayed at Solomon’s inauguration and at coronations of subsequent kings.  It is a prayer that asks God to endow the newly anointed political leader with justice (mishpat) and righteousness (zedekah), Hebrew terms that describe God’s desired state of affairs (mishpat) and being in full harmony with God’s will (zedekah).  As James Howell, pastor of Myers Park United Methodist Church in Charlotte, NC, observes: “the king is measured, not by hordes of chariots or the gold in the treasury, but by whether the cause of the poor was defended, whether the needy were delivered.”  1

The people pray for a ruler who will enact policies that will result in abundance for everyone–not just the few, and who will put into place protections for those who are vulnerable to abuse by those with power.  THIS is a ruler who shows (s)he possesses God’s justice and God’s righteousness.  Having this kind of political leader would indeed be like “refreshing showers that water the earth.”  Psalm 72:6

Questions For Reflection

In our opinion, who (besides Jesus) has come closest to embodying this kind of political leader?  What actions and/or policies did that person enact that match God’s justice and righteousness?

As citizens of a democracy that get to select our leaders, do you think we should use Psalm 72 to evaluate them as candidates?  Why or why not?

1. James Howell’s commentary on Psalm 72

Psalm 82:1-4 (A Psalm of Asaph)

God presides in the great assembly; he renders judgment among the “gods”:
“How long will you defend the unjust and show partiality to the wicked?
Defend the weak and the fatherless; uphold the cause of the poor and the oppressed.
Rescue the weak and the needy; deliver them from the hand of the wicked.

Many Biblical scholars identify the “gods” of this passage to be the political leaders of the people.  God is portrayed as the judge in the courtroom, ruling on how well the political leaders have performed their God-given duties.  They have failed miserably.  Instead of protecting, defending and rescuing those who are most vulnerable among the population (what God has charged them to do), they have sided with the “unjust and the wicked.”  While aliens and strangers (immigrants and refugees) are not specifically identified in the passage, they were often listed among those most at risk for being oppressed throughout God’s Law.

Questions for Reflection

If God were to take our national political leaders to court to determine their effectiveness in performing their God-given duties, especially in relationship to immigration law, how do you think they would measure up?

What might “upholding the cause of the oppressed” look like from a legislative perspective?

When was the last time you contacted your political leaders (representatives, senators, governor, and/or president) to hold them to account for their legislative actions toward the most vulnerable?  Find the contact information for all your legislative leaders HERE.

Exodus 23:9

“Do not oppress a foreigner; you yourselves know how it feels to be foreigners, because you were foreigners in Egypt.”

As you may recall from Sunday school (if that was part of your childhood experience), Jacob’s family migrated to Egypt as environmental refugees due to a famine. There was food in Egypt (thanks to Joseph’s visionary leadership of the newly formed Department of Agriculture–it’s a long story). Though initially welcomed (Genesis 45:16-19), their  experience quickly turned following a change in political leadership, and Jacob’s descendants were marginalized and oppressed.  (See Exodus 1) After God delivered them from their oppression, God commanded them to use their marginalized experience as a guide in their treatment of immigrants and environmental refugees in their community.

The United States is often referred to as the “Nation of Immigrants”. Unless you are a member of an indigenous tribe or were a slave brought to this country against your will, your ancestors were immigrants or environmental refugees.  However, many people have forgotten or diminished their immigrant history and experience, leading them to use phrases like “my country” and advocate for stricter laws that marginalize and oppress new arrivals to the U.S.

Questions for Reflection

Were your ancestors immigrants? If so, why did they come to the U.S.? What stories did you hear about their experience? Were they accepted upon their arrival? What challenges did they face? What feelings might they have had?

When have you felt like a “foreigner”? Describe those feelings. What, if anything, helped to relieve those feelings?

How can you use your (or your family’s) migration experience to act more justly toward immigrants today?

For the Record

HUD Secretary Ben Carson’s statement that slaves were immigrants is totally inaccurate–yet another ‘alternative fact’.  Immigrants and environmental refugees move by choice or necessity.  African slaves were moved as human cargo without choice.

Isaiah 10:1-3

Woe to those who make unjust laws, to those who issue oppressive decrees,
to deprive the poor of their rights and withhold justice from the oppressed of my people,
making widows their prey and robbing the fatherless.
What will you do on the day of reckoning, when disaster comes from afar?
To whom will you run for help? Where will you leave your riches?

Yesterday, the president signed an Executive Order revising the travel restrictions that were struck down by the courts in January.  The new Executive Order removes the nation of Iraq from the list of 7 nations with restrictions–something those in the intelligence and military communities wanted to see, but maintains the 90-day ban on travel from the remaining six.  Refugees, on the other hand, got a mixture of good and bad news.  The good news: The new law removes the “indefinite” ban on Syrian Refugees.  The bad news: the new law reduces the total number of refugees that will be admitted (from all parts of the world) to the U.S. by 55% (50,000 refugees will be admitted in FY 2017–down from 110,000 last year).  Read the entire Executive Order HERE.

When the first Executive Order was issued in January, leaders from across the U.S. representing every faith tradition and denomination, immediately responded to the president’s action decrying the refugee ban as unjust and oppressive. The response thus far to the new order has been equally critical.   Tim Breene, CEO of World Relief, a Evangelical Christian refugee resettlement agency that works closely with the government was quoted in Christianity Today: “The issuance of a new executive order on refugees and immigrants acknowledges that there were significant problems with the first executive order that caught up green card holders and others as they tried to enter to the United States. However, this new executive order does not solve the root problems with the initial order—the cutting of refugee admissions by 55 percent and the inability for some of the world’s most vulnerable refugees to come to the United States. It is more of the same.”  Church World Services (CWS) issued a strongly worded statement condemning the rewritten order, saying, “Make no mistake: this rewritten version will have the same impact.”

Question for Reflection

According to PRRI, a nonprofit, nonpartisan polling organization, support for the temporary ban on Muslims has declined among all all groups except one–white Evangelical Protestants.  In February 2017, 61% favored the ban (compared to 55% in May 2016). Why do you think Evangelical Protestants continue to support the ban?

Take Action

Consider traveling to Springfield, IL, with the Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights on Wednesday, March 15, to push legislators at the State Capital to make Illinois a Sanctuary State.  Message the church via Facebook for information.

Leviticus 19:33-34

When an alien resides with you in your land, you shall not oppress the alien. The alien who resides with you shall be to you as the citizen among you; you shall love the alien as yourself, for you were aliens in the land of Egypt: I am the Lord your God.

Exodus 12:49

There shall be one law for the native and for the alien who resides among you.

On April 7, 1933, the German government passed the Law for the Restoration of the Professional Civil Service.  The law protected Germans first.  Non-Aryans (Jews, Romani, Africans and dissenters) were no longer permitted to work as teachers, professors, judges, or other government positions. Later, the law was amended to include the professions of lawyers, doctors, tax consultants, musicians, and notaries.  The passage of the law resulted in social exclusion–and economic destitution–for all those who were non-Aryan.  Additional restrictive laws were passed and within 8 years, Jews were required by law to wear a yellow star of David as identification and deportation to death camps quickly followed.

Laws that “alienate”, laws that define who belongs and who does not, laws that limit or deny access to community life are oppressive and unjust.  But in God’s politics, immigrants are to be treated as if they are citizens.  There is one law for both native-born and the resident alien.  God effectively erases the line between the native-born “us” and the immigrant “other”.

Questions for Reflection

Can you think of laws that have been passed in our nation’s history (recent or otherwise) that were designed to “alienate” a segment of the population?

Why do you think people–especially people of faith–would support legislation that would identify and deny immigrants and/or refugees access to full participation in community life when God has made God’s will clear?

Our current president frequently uses the phrase “America First” to define its agenda–the America First Energy Plan and America First Foreign Policy.  Many people hear echoes of the German past in the phrase.  Should people be concerned? Why or why not?

Read “Alien”, Pastor Ray’s sermon from the First Sunday of Lent, March 5, 2017.

Despite yesterday’s statement that nothing would be posted on Sunday, March 5, a news story broke that needed to be shared.  Read it, weep, and pray. Pray for Daniela; pray for her family; pray for the lawyers and the judges; pray for our nation; pray for boldness and courage to stand up, to speak up, to act up.  On this Sunday, feast on love of neighbor that frees from oppression.

Matthew 2:13-23

Now after they had left, an angel of the Lord appeared to Joseph in a dream and said, “Get up, take the child and his mother, and flee to Egypt, and remain there until I tell you; for Herod is about to search for the child, to destroy him.” Then Joseph got up, took the child and his mother by night, and went to Egypt, and remained there until the death of Herod. This was to fulfill what had been spoken by the Lord through the prophet, “Out of Egypt I have called my son.”

When Herod saw that he had been tricked by the wise men, he was infuriated, and he sent and killed all the children in and around Bethlehem who were two years old or under, according to the time that he had learned from the wise men. Then was fulfilled what had been spoken through the prophet Jeremiah: 

“A voice was heard in Ramah,
wailing and loud lamentation,
Rachel weeping for her children;
she refused to be consoled, because they are no more.”

When Herod died, an angel of the Lord suddenly appeared in a dream to Joseph in Egypt and said, “Get up, take the child and his mother, and go to the land of Israel, for those who were seeking the child’s life are dead.” Then Joseph got up, took the child and his mother, and went to the land of Israel. But when he heard that Archelaus was ruling over Judea in place of his father Herod, he was afraid to go there. And after being warned in a dream, he went away to the district of Galilee. There he made his home in a town called Nazareth, so that what had been spoken through the prophets might be fulfilled, “He will be called a Nazorean.”

Why do people leave their homes and move to unfamiliar places?  Historically, there have been surges in immigration during times of famine, war, environmental disasters, and persecution.  People move when their survival at home is threatened.  Jesus’ family moved across the border to Egypt to escape political violence.  And later Joseph moved his family to Nazareth in Galilee because he perceived it to be safer than Judea. In both cases, Joseph relocated when he sensed that his family’s survival was threatened.

Today, refugees endure a multi-year vetting process before being allowed into the United States, and for Syrian refugees, the process can take longer–even though we know the threat of death is real!  It is unlikely that Joseph (and Mary and Jesus) would pass the current vetting process to gain entry as refugees or to be given asylum.  Picture the interaction:

UN Representative: “Sir, why are you seeking refuge in the US?”

Joseph: I was told in a dream that my son is in danger of being killed.”

UN Representative: I’m sorry. Dreams are not considered credible evidence. Next!”

If Joseph were to enter the U.S. today, he would likely have to come in as an undocumented immigrant making Jesus, ironically, a ‘Dreamer’ (alien minor).

Question for Reflection:

What do you think God wants us to learn from Jesus’ experience as a refugee and an immigrant?

Nothing will be posted on Sunday, March 5.