On Sunday, January 18, a group of about 30 people joined the worship service at Cities Church in St. Paul, MN. The church is a member congregation of the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) with close ties to Christ Church DC, the congregation Pete Hegseth attends when in Washington.

Midway through the service, the group, led by Nekima Levy Armstrong, an ordained minister and community activist, interrupted the service with chants of “Justice for Renee Good” and “ICE Out.” In an interview with the Washington Post, Levy Armstrong said that the disruption was aimed at David Easterwood, who is listed on the church’s website as a Pastor of the church. Easterwood is also the acting director of the local field office of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). In a court filing submitted on January 5, he wrote that federal agents were experiencing increased threats and aggression and crowd control devices like flashbang grenades were important to protect against violent attacks. He also defended ICE’s tactics in Minnesota such as swapping license plates and spraying protesters with chemical irritants. (source)

In an interview with Democracy Now, Levy Armstrong stated: “I believe that if someone professes to represent the Gospel of Jesus Christ and to preach it, that they should not be allowing ICE agents to drag people out of their homes, cut women out of seat belts in their cars and drag them out, bust down doors, bust out car windows, bring people out half-naked in the freezing cold to detain them, taking trophy pictures with Black men and others that they’ve apprehended in their homes, scaring children, tear-gassing children and families, almost killing a 6-month-old through the use of high-powered, military-grade weapons such as flashbang grenades and very strong tear gas…. It’s delusional to pretend that there [isn’t] a significant problem with David Easterwood serving as a pastor and as the overseer of ICE and defending their conduct….”

The response to the incident has been swift and loud–and overwhelmingly supportive of the Cities Church and its lead pastor, Jonathan Parnell.

The Minnesota-Wisconsin Baptist Convention, of which Cities Church is a member, issued a statement calling the disruption ”an unacceptable trauma,”

Kevin Ezell, president of the SBC’s North American Mission Board, wrote: “No cause — political or otherwise — justifies the desecration of a sacred space or the intimidation and trauma inflicted on families gathered peacefully in the house of God, What occurred was not protest; it was lawless harassment.”

Albert Mohler, the president of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, weighed in on his podcast. “For Christians, the precedent of invading a congregation at worship should be unthinkable,” He also cited Romans 13 to defend ICE, saying the agents should “be recognized for their authority and for the legitimacy of their mission.”

The US Government also took action in defense of the church. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt tweeted: “President Trump will not tolerate the intimidation and harassment of Christians in their sacred places of worship.” Then, on Thursday, FBI Director Kash Patel announced that Levy Armstrong and two other protesters had been arrested, jailed and charged with violating the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, which prohibits interference or intimidation of “any person by force, threat of force, or physical obstruction exercising or seeking to exercise the First Amendment right of religious freedom at a place of religious worship. (Note: on Friday, all three people were released from jail by order of a federal judge.)

When Vice-president JD Vance visited Minneapolis on that same day, he delivered a stern warning to the people of Minnesota:“Respect people’s rights, respect people’s rights to worship, respect people’s rights to do their job without being assaulted. If you follow that basic principle, the Trump administration is going to do everything that we can to protect your rights. But if you go after somebody, if you assault somebody, if you make a 9-year-old girl cry because you walked into her church and harassed her, we’re going to go after you with every single tool that we have.” .While he said that mistakes may have been made by individual officers, he offered no apologies and said nothing about ICE agents shooting protesters, harassing schools, using chemical irritants on young people or traumatizing a 5-year-old boy.

And that’s my issue. Why haven’t church leaders demanded accountability for ICE brutality? Where were the church leaders when the government announced in January 2025 that federal immigration agencies could make arrests in churches, schools and hospitals–locations that had always been considered protected? Where was the outrage when ICE agents detained Tampa, FL, pastor Maurilio Ambrocio in April 2025 when he appeared for a routine check-in with ICE or when pastor’s wife Maria Isidro was deported to Mexico on June 11, 2025. And where will church leaders be today following the fatal shooting of a second US citizen in Minneapolis by ICE agents under the direction of Pastor David Easterwood. Silence is complicity. Outright support of ICE’s indiscriminate cruelty is morally and theologically indefensible.

Disruption becomes necessary when the Church colludes with cruelty and lawlessness while sanctimoniously claiming that it is being persecuted for righteousness and is in need of legal protection. Disruption is necessary when the church perpetuates injustice. As historian (and a person of Christian faith) Jamar Tisby pointed out on his Footnotes podcast, there is a long history of church disruptors..

Imagine the prophet Isaiah standing at the temple gates and saying, “Stop bringing meaningless offerings! Your incense is detestable to me. New Moons, Sabbaths and convocations—I cannot bear your worthless assemblies. Your New Moon feasts and your appointed festivals I hate with all my being. They have become a burden to me; I am weary of bearing them. When you spread out your hands in prayer, I hide my eyes from you; even when you offer many prayers, I am not listening. Your hands are full of blood!” (Isaiah 1:13-15 [NIV])

Imagine the reaction when the Prophet Amos stood up and said, “I hate, I despise your religious festivals; your assemblies are a stench to me. Even though you bring me burnt offerings and grain offerings, I will not accept them. Though you bring choice fellowship offerings, I will have no regard for them. Away with the noise of your songs! I will not listen to the music of your harps. But let justice roll on like a river, righteousness like a never-failing stream!“

We know the reaction of the temple leaders when Jesus disrupted “religious business as usual,” turning over tables of the money changers and driving out the vendors of sacrificial animals.”

Tisby also recounts the church disruptions known as “Kneel-ins” used by civil rights activists from 1960 – 1965. One of the most significant “kneel-ins” occurred on Palm Sunday 1964, when an integrated group of students entered the Sunday worship service at Second Presbyterian Church in Memphis to protest the church’s policy of segregation. They didn’t chant; they didn’t rant; but they did disrupt just by entering the church. The group returned for 8 Sundays, forcing the church to reconsider its policy and allow the integration of its service. This led to a church- split in 1965 over the issue with those wanting to maintain segregation forming the Independent Presbyterian Church, but change ultimately happened. Forty-five years later, a new generation of church leaders at Independent Presbyterian Church, made the decision to address its past and entered a time of reckoning through prayer and corporate repentance. You can read more about the history of the”Kneel-ins” HERE.

Disruption is uncomfortable–even traumatic–because it challenges the status quo.. But as we have learned from history, church disruption can result in either steadfast resistance against change or humble reflection and reformation. Sadly, what we’ve seen in the initial reactions to the disruption in St. Paul, MN, is resistance. While we may disagree with the tactics used to challenge church complicity with ICE and participation in the harm done to families and communities throughout Minnesota though one of its leaders, we should not–WE MUST NOT–vilify those who have been bold enough to raise the issue. And we must not conflate disruption with violence or lawlessness.

“The question isn’t whether disruption belongs in church. The question is whether the Church still belongs to a God who overturns tables. The church more offended by disruption than suffering has already chosen its God.” –Jemar Tisby.