I’m glad I wasn’t the only pastor offended by the “Pope Trump” photo. For a while, I thought everyone else had dismissed it as just more Trump bombast and buffoonery.

Roman Catholic Bishop Thomas Paprocki of Springfield, IL, posted on X, “This is deeply offensive to Catholics especially during this sacred time that we are still mourning the death of Pope Francis and praying for the guidance of the Holy Spirit for the election of our new Pope. He owes an apology.” Rev. Cameron Trimble wrote on her “Piloting Faith” substack: “It [the photo] shows us what he wants to be: the single, unquestioned authority, not only the most powerful political leader on earth, but a spiritual one, cloaked in divine right. It’s not a joke. It’s a confession.” Atlanta pastor and Grammy award winner Jamal Bryant wrote on Threads, “This is disrespectful and dishonorable. I challenge evangelical leaders to have it removed at once …. Now he wants to be king and pope?” So far, I haven’t found any evangelical leaders who have taken up his challenge.

But it was Rev. William Barber III, who was arrested last Monday in the Capital Rotunda for leading a prayer service, that put the photo into a bigger context, calling it “a diabolical intentional distraction.” He appealed to religious leaders to “pivot back to how his budget will be deadly, destructive, & disastrous to the very people Jesus cared about and will undermine the very hope of America to be a just nation.”

It’s a good point. If everyone is talking the offensiveness of the “Pope Trump” photo, no one will be talking about his “one big, beautiful bill” (ie the budget). Trust me, #47 does NOT want you to know about, think about, talk about or do anything about the budget–and neither does House Speaker, Mike Johnson. That’s because the budget is indeed deadly to the most vulnerable–the very ones we are to care for according to James 1:27.

What makes it so deadly? If the budget proposed by the Office of Budget and Management is approved, every department and agency will experience significant cuts that will impact Medicaid, FEMA, Headstart, Section-8 housing vouchers, SNAP, the environment and more. While many program funds are cut, the budget proposal also includes significant increases for Defense whose total budget will exceed $1 TRILLION for the first time and for Homeland Security whose total budget will top $175 Billion to “finally secure the southern border,” (ie finish the Wall), expand detention facilities for whoever ICE arrests, and increase mass deportations.

In a letter sent on May 2, 2025, to the Senate Committee on Appropriations, OMB Director Russell T. Vought explained the cuts (and increases) in the following way: “The recommended funding levels result from a rigorous, line-by-line review of FY 2025 spending, which was found to be laden with spending contrary to the needs of ordinary working Americans and tilted toward funding niche non-governmental organizations and institutions of higher education committed to radical gender and climate ideologies antithetical to the American way of life.”

Spending contrary to the needs of ordinary working Americans? This budget calls for a $4 billion cut to the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance program (LIHEAP). The logic? These funds won’t be necessary in 2026 since–according to the budget summary–the President is “unleashing energy production” that will drive down prices and everyone–no matter what their income–will be able to afford to heat and cool their homes without government assistance.

All government budgets are moral documents that identify the values and priorities of the administration. This budget is an immoral document that reflects this administration’s priority to reshape the nation to conform to the vision of Project 2025. That’s not surprising since Russell Vought was also the principal architect of that equally immoral document.